So the Army is being forced to cut more soldiers from its ranks, combat-hardened and experienced soldiers at that. Which individually are very valuable to their tradecraft than just being a soldier.
Army Announces Force Structure and Stationing Decisions
The Department of the Army announced today force structure decisions and stationing plans for the reduction of the regular Army from 490,000 to 450,000 soldiers. The reduction of force structure will occur in fiscal years 2016 and 2017; the reduction of 40,000 end strength will be completed by the end of fiscal year 2018, and will be accompanied by the reduction of 17,000 Department of the Army civilian employees. These cuts will impact nearly every Army installation, both in the continental United States and overseas.
As part of these reductions, the number of regular Army brigade combat teams, the basic deployable units of maneuver in the Army, will continue to reduce from a wartime high of 45 to 30 by the end of fiscal year 2017. The Army will convert both the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Benning, Georgia and the 4th Airborne Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska into smaller unitsmaneuver battalion task forcesby the end of fiscal year 2017. While brigade combat teams consist of approximately 4,000 soldiers, these battalion task forces will be comprised of approximately 1,050 soldiers.
Additionally, the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division will remain a brigade combat team, but will convert its primary maneuver platform. Currently, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division is a Stryker brigade combat team, however, it will become an infantry brigade combat team without Stryker combat vehicles. Additionally, the Army is analyzing a proposal to use the brigade combat team’s current Stryker equipment to convert an Army National Guard brigade combat team in the Pacific Northwest to a Stryker configuration.
The Army selected these brigade combat teams for reorganization based on a variety of factors including strategic requirements and the inherent military value of the installations where they are based. The force structure decisions announced today best posture a smaller Army to meet global commitments.
“Budget constraints are forcing us to reduce the Total Army,” said Lt. Gen. Joseph Anderson, Army deputy chief of staff, G-3/5/7. “These were very difficult decisions to make as all of our installations and their communities offer tremendous value to our Army and the nation. In the end, we had to make decisions based on a number of strategic factors, to include readiness impacts, mission command and cost.”
If the fiscal-caps of the 2011 Budget Control Act caps, commonly referred to as sequestration, are not addressed, the Army’s end-strength will be further reduced to 420,000 soldiers by the end of fiscal year 2019. This will result in a cumulative loss of 150,000 soldiers from the regular Army a 26 percent cut over a seven year period. The resulting force would be incapable of simultaneously meeting current deployment requirements and responding to the overseas contingency requirements of the combatant commands.
For more information on this release, please contact Lt. Col. Joe Buccino at 703-697-5662, Office of the Chief of Public Affairs, Office of the Secretary of the Army.
Do you realize the Army wants to cut another 40,000 soldiers and 17,600 DA Civilians by the end of fiscal year 2018 and then another 30,000 a year later? Are you seeing this? Do you realize it is not just 40,000 soldiers but rather 70,000 soldiers by Sept 30, 2019 and 17,600 civilians. So a total of 87,600 on top of all that has been cut.
Did you also pick this line up at the end of that official release, “The resulting force would be incapable of simultaneously meeting current deployment requirements and responding to the overseas contingency requirements of the combatant commands.”?
I am so glad that we are currently living in a Nirvana of a world with no real threats against us as a nation where we would need a defense force to protect our country and our assets and allies. It is nice not having to worry about things like Iran, North Korea, Russian aggression, Cartels, oh and some Junior Varsity team called ISIS or ISIL or whatever you want to call them. I prefer Pure Hate and Evil, but that is all semantics.
So while we as a nation are watching our Stock Exchange go offline, the Chinese markets crash, Greece (and possibly the EU) in mass turmoil, our Government has decided “it’s all good” and we have less need than ever to have a strong and sizable military.
Oh hey look there is a squirrel with a confederate flag, go chase it……