Decorated soldier’s blog attracts loyal following, but he says his bosses are muzzling him

The following story came out today in all four Military Times Publications (Army Times, Air Force Times, Marine Times, Navy Times), on the back cover where the “Off Duty” Section is. As anyone who reads this blog knows, CJ and I are very close and talk regularly outside of our weekly Radio show that we host together. Please take a few moments to read this story and then hope, pray, cross your fingers, whatever that the Army does not retaliate against him.

By Jon R. Anderson

Master Sgt. C.J.

Grisham is not the type to shy away from a fight. Decorated for valor in Iraq, the 15-year Army veteran is also saluted as one of the most popular, if sometimes controversial, bloggers in the mili­tary. Where the average life ex­pectancy of a blog is said to be less than three months, Grisham’s has survived for six years.

But he says he has had enough.

“Blogging is no longer worth the trouble,” Grisham recently wrote on his blog, A Soldier ’s Perspec­tive, under the headline “ASP Closed for Business.” Assigned to a military intelli­gence company at Redstone Arse­nal, Ala., Grisham’s in-your-face opinions have won him a loyal fol­lowing but also earned the scorn of his superiors, who contend he vio­lated military limits about what troops can say on certain topics.

Grisham has criticized Presi­dent Barack Obama’s fitness to run the country, chided the Demo­cratic Party and battled with local school officials. He has been in­vestigated by the inspector gener­al and called on the carpet by his commanders.

Though he has not been ordered to stop blogging, he says he can’t do so under the restrictions placed on him.

In a note to the nearly 5,000 people on his private mailing list, Grisham wrote, “The facts are clear. The Army does NOT want honest bloggers. They want sheep. … If I can’t be honest and open, I won’t write at all.” Lt. Col. Bruce Johnson, comman­der of Grisham’s parent command, the Fort Meade, Md.-based 309th Military Intelligence Battalion, referred questions to a spokesman.

Command Sgt. Maj. Carl Myers of the 309th told Military Times that Grisham’s situation was “in the process of being looked into. I’m not sure what the particulars are, just that it’s being looked into.” Grisham and his blog posts un­derscore the challenges in trying to impose military limitations on free speech on troops fighting to protect such freedoms. And they highlight the difficulties the brass faces in trying at the same time to embrace and contain the reach of blogging, Facebook, Twitter and other forms of newly emerging “social media.”

Army Master Sgt. C.J. Grisham, currently stationed at Redstone Arsenal, Ala., operates the controversial blog A Soldier’s Perspective. Pictured with his wife, Emily, Grisham has faced criticism from his command.

‘Chicken Hawk’

Standing an inch shy of 5½ feet tall in basic training, Grisham was dubbed “Chicken Hawk” after Henery Hawk, the tough bird with a big mouth in the Foghorn Leghorn cartoons. He earned the nickname when he took down the biggest guy in his platoon three times in a row during pugil-stick training.

Eight years later, during the in­ vasion of Iraq, Grisham took down a squad of Iraqis when his counterintelligence detachment got pinned down in an ambush.

He earned the Bronze Star with “V” after rushing through the gunfire by himself with just a 9mm pistol and a hand grenade.

No, Grisham is not afraid of a fight and he’s not afraid to speak his mind, either.

After returning from war, Grisham launched A Soldier ’s Perspective. He started the site as a way to share his experiences and tell his Army story. In his first post he promised to cover the range of military life “from the inane to the insane. … Sometimes I will complain about and sometimes I will laud my chosen profession of arms.” And he delivered.

His posts soon gathered a wide following with a readership that has spanned more than 120 coun­tries. Nearly 1 million hits later, ASP garnered an average of 1,500 visitors per day, making it the second most popular site on, an index of mil­itary blogs.

Focused and scrappy

Pugnacious, deeply patriotic, pro-Army yet prolific in both his praise and criticism, Grisham has helped launch four successful blogs and a weekly Internet radio show. He mostly focuses on rais­ing awareness ( and often money) for veterans issues, but he also patrols through the minefields of local and national politics.

Indeed, he is an unabashed con­servative with razor-wire wit who has cast stones at what he calls “Repugnicans” and “Dumbocrats” alike but has also been to the White House twice — invited first by President George W. Bush, and more recently by President Barack Obama — for roundtable discussions on military outreach.

All this while remaining a top­rated senior noncommissioned officer, a troop-leading first sergeant and an active counterin­telligence agent, according to his fitness reports. “A true Soldiers’ Soldier. Promote to SGM immedi­ately,” gushed his senior rater in Grisham’s most recent evaluation in June.

Yet after nearly six years of active blogging, in recent months Grisham has found himself the target of an inspector general investigation and a threatened general letter of reprimand. Now his command is exploring formal charges against him.

A summer of dissed content

Last summer Grisham got into hot water when someone com­plained to officials that he encour­aged readers to vote against gun control measures, called for a wholesale changing of the guard in Congress and questioned Obama’s truthfulness.

In a blog section titled “Obama is wrong for America,” he wrote: “The reality is that the American people can NOT take the Presi­dent at his word.” At least that’s what he assumes was the problem based on the questions investigators with the Army Intelligence and Security Command’s inspector general asked him.

The IG closed the case without further action. Grisham filed a re­quest for a copy of the report but still hasn’t seen it. “Four months later I have yet to actually seeany of the IG complaints against me or where I might have done anything wrong,” he said.

The IG’s office did not return phone calls requesting comment.

Not long after, Grisham was fired from his job as an intelli­gence company first sergeant at Redstone and punted to a garri­son position. The firing also came not long after he announced on his radio show — during an inter­view with Gen. Peter Chiarelli — that he was wrestling with post­traumatic stress disorder and planned to seek help. During the show, Grisham said he wanted to lead from the front when it came to reducing the stigma of PTSD.

The move also came just days after being quoted in a Military Times feature story on the chang­ing landscape of social media in­side the ranks.

“The upper echelon gets it, the lower echelon gets it,” Grisham said at the time, “but it’s the mid­dle ranks in between — the O-5s and O-6s — that are still really struggling with whether or not this is a good thing.”

Uniform dissent

Grisham’s most recent battle with his superiors grew out of his blogging about disagreements he had with the local school board after they decided to im­plement a student uniform policy halfway into the year without input from parents.

Grisham, who had two kids in the school, posted unflattering video he shot of school officials fumbling through a meeting. School offi­cials called the Army to complain. His company com­mander, Capt. Brian Hawkins, called Grisham in to talk about it. “I felt like this was a matter be­tween him and the school,” Hawkins said. “They were con­cerned about him being a threat. I can tell you he’s not a threat. I read what he wrote. I didn’t take it as threatening.” Hawkins’ message to the school: “If you feel threatened by him, if you feel threatened by anyone, you should call the police.” School officials instead took their complaints up the chain of command.

In the weeks that followed, Grisham says, Redstone Arsenal garrison commander Col. Robert Pastorelli and Command Sgt.

Maj. Rickey Cooper repeatedly called him on the carpet, ordering him to remove posts.

Grisham said he was ordered to see investigators at Criminal In­vestigation Command to deter­mine whether he’d broken any laws.

“They said the only threat I made was to threaten a lawsuit and, of course, that’s not illegal,” Grisham said. He was soon or­dered by his command to scale back his blogging, so his wife, Emily, took over.

“Since he gets in trouble every time he writes something, I’m going to write what’s going on.

They can’t do anything to me,” she wrote. The next day, Grisham said he was yelled at for his wife’s posts. Pastorelli and Cooper declined to comment. Post spokeswoman Kim Henry said Grisham was coun­seled and ordered to remove the video posts, but said she would have to consult with military lawyers when asked if that was a lawful order.

“It’s not a lawful order and it goes to the heart of free expres­sion,” said Capt. Mike Lebowitz, an Army lawyer for the Virginia National Guard who regularly lectures at Yale University on mil­itary free speech issues. “Filming anyone at a public meeting is fair game.” “I don’t know how he disgraced the NCO Corps,” said Sgt. 1st Class Chad Vervaet, an instructor at the NCO Academy, who has moved his son out of the same school because of problems there.

“This never should have been a military issue in the first place. I was at all the same meetings at the school with C.J. and he never once threatened anyone.” “This is a failure of leadership on the Army’s side,” said Dale Jack­son, a former soldier and local radio journalist who has been cov­ering the controversy. “Instead of the commanders protecting their soldier, they just tried to make the problem go away by telling C.J. to shut up. Except C.J. stood his ground. He’s not one to be bullied.” “We are in need of more veterans and troops speaking out, not less,” writes one blogger at War on Ter­ror News. “Whether the voices are silenced by governmental interfer­ence, harassment, or fatigue, the results are the same: another voice in the debate silenced.” Even officials at the Pentagon have taken notice.

“I know he’s pretty frustrated.

And it must be a pretty high level of frustration for him to stop doing what he’s doing because I know he loves what he’s doing,” said Lt. Col. Kevin Arata, the Army’s point man for social media issues, who has known Grisham’s name for years.

“As far as what’s going on be­tween him and his chain of com­mand, I don’t think that’s for me to say, but he’s certainly done a great job over these past few years,” said Arata, adding “any time we lose someone of that cal­iber, there’s a certain amount of loss for the Army.”

The last word

Grisham is preparing to report to Fort Hood, Texas, in February.

He’s hopeful for a fresh start but says he is feeling pessimistic. He was planning to take a month of leave, but his command has told him any time off will be suspend­ed if officials decide to conduct a fact-finding “15-6 investigation” into his blogging.

“I feel frustrated, and I feel be­trayed,” he said. “It really affects me. Moral integrity means some­thing to me. The NCO Creed means something to me,” he says, quietly repeating it aloud from memory, almost as if in prayer.

“I am surrounded by heroic Americans who would give their lives if needed, but this whole thing has really soured me and made me second-guess what I’m doing here. Why am I in an orga­nization that would throw you to the fish like this? … All it takes is one command who doesn’t get it [to] turn your life upside down.”

Grisham is one of the most popular military bloggers, reaching some 1,500 readers a day — until recently, when he shut down A Soldier’s Perspective.
A Snapshot of CJ’s Blogging and online Activities



Posts: 3,466

Comments: 26,000+

Guest bloggers: About 12, from all four services, including several general officers.

Grisham’s other military blogs

They Have Names ( ): A site dedicated to telling the individual stories of fallen service members in Iraq and Afghanistan.

You Served ( ): A regular rundown of veterans news and benefits.

You Served Weekly BlogTalkRadio Podcast ( /

youserved ): A weekly Web radio show with a variety of guests of interest to the military community.

Twitter ( / cjgrisham ): Grisham’s microblogging site.

Military Pundits ( http: // ): A site for more politically charged commentary, launched by Grisham and now a collective for several writers.


Since this article was originally written several new things have happened. For one, CJ is pursuing legal action against the School Board and the several other parties who’s actions have caused his impeccable military career to be tarnished and have caused his family to be split up. CJ is also securing one of the most successful and high-profile attorneys that has represented many cases defending against over-zealous military court systems. All of this costs money of course. CJ has sold his website A Soldier’s Prospective (ASP) to Cat5 Commerce in order to help raise money. The folks at Cat5 are keeping the site up and are hoping to keep it business as usual, to include having CJ continue his blogging there. Below is a quote from the first blog entry on ASP from the new owners,

Cat5 operates multiple retail destinations that have proudly served the military community for over five years. With CJ’s full cooperation, Cat5 has secured the rights to the blog and the domain name for A Soldier’s Perspective. Our sole reason for doing this is to provide CJ and company with the uncensored platform that has come to represent everything that ASP stands for.

CJ’s struggles with the PTA and the Army have been well documented here. These struggles culminated with his recent decision to shut the blog down. As loyal readers of A Soldier’s Perspective ourselves, we felt compelled to act and offered to operate the site in an effort to keep it going. CJ accepted, and by doing so, he can move past the technical and legal aspects of operating a blog and focus on what he does best — speaking the truth.

To be perfectly clear, Cat5 Commerce has only one objective in regards to A Soldier’s Perspective: To give soldiers a voice. CJ has assured us he will continue posting and contributing, and we are reaching out to the rest of the staff to extend the same opportunity. We are fully committed to preserving the honesty, the integrity and the authenticity that has made ASP one of the most compelling military blogs on the web. Thank you for your continued support and for you ongoing interest in A Soldier’s Perspective. More can be read at

Also, CJ is cutting all costs, unnecessary expenditures, etc. so he can have the money needed to pay for retainers, etc. He is also humbling himself by asking for donations towards his legal costs.

You can Click the Button below

Or you can also mail checks or money orders to:
Grisham Legal Fund
c/o Redstone Federal Credit Union
220 Wynn Drive
Huntsville, AL 35893
Please write “Grisham Legal Fund” in the memo line if you use this option.

On Behalf of I want to thank all and everyone for your assistance for CJ.

In addition, I am taking all profits from the sale of any hats, embroidered shirts, decals (which are the only items in the Bouhammer Gear Store that I make a profit on) and giving those towards CJ’s legal Fund. I will continue to do this from now until CJ tells me he does not need it anymore.

9 thoughts on “Decorated soldier’s blog attracts loyal following, but he says his bosses are muzzling him”

  1. I’ve been following CJ’s dilemna since the beginning.. and I just can’t believe how far it has gone. “Witch hunt” doesn’t even come close to describing what is being done to him. There was NOTHING WRONG with ANYTHING he did or said at those PTO meetings. The board singled him out due to his military background even though others voiced the same opinions. I really don’t get it. It makes me angry and sad all at the same time.

  2. My thoughts as someone who has written for over 2 decades:
    When someone orders you to take down a post, it’s a direct assault on free speech. The Army should have told the school district to naff off!

    As for C.J.’s outspoken views on various political issues, I think it’s his right. I can’t imagine fighting for freedom and then coming home to find out that you can’t exercise those rights. He doesn’t trust Obama? Fine. He thinks the O-5’s and O-6’s don’t get it? He can say that too.

    It’s this kind of intimidation that drives bloggers to write anonymously. As a writer who has always had her own byline, I can’t tell you how much I hate that. Writing takes a lot of care and consideration. It’s a craft, and the reason CJ’s blog was so popular was that he is also a writer who expresses himself very well. But also, it was successful because he didn’t blog anonymously. In other words, the reader had someone they could get to know.

    As a woman, I can’t tell you how much it disturbs me to see a few milspouses blog anonymously, then further go onto censure themselves by only writing about kids and gripes, when really –they have a range of opinions that should be shared. Like it or not, the military community is smack-dab in the middle politics. Our entire lives hinge upon the political system. I do not subscribe to the notion that we should sit by mutely.

    There needs to be a lot of work done in order to erase the stereotypes that leads to discrimination against the military and their families. We are a free-thinking, unabashedly Patriotic bunch. We love our country, but this is not to say we are in lock-step with everything political, military or even with one another. Allowing bloggers express themselves freely is an easy first step.

    Will I overstep my boundaries someday, maybe even upset the higher ups who are in control of my husband’s career? Probably. I’ll cross that bridge when I get to it. But more than likely, I’ll be able to out-write them, so truthfully, it doesn’t bug me too much.
    .-= Kanani Fong´s last blog ..A Little Boy Burned: Winter’s Work at The FST =-.

  3. Thank you for publishing this expose. I too have been following the story and know where my fight lies, but I’m not entirely sure how to organize. Godspeed to everyone that has put their shoulder to the wheel on this one.
    .-= Professor Tom´s last blog ..Domestic Terrorist =-.

  4. I’ve had attempts by my command to stifle my writing last tour, but never to this degree. This is a disgraceful act by his chain of command and cowardice at it’s worst. The MSGT has done nothing wrong and deserves none of this. Hold Tight MSGT, the MilBloggers are behind you all the way.

  5. What has happened in Huntsville is truly shameful.

    Huntsville city districts 2,3 and 4 are having elections in 2010 for both city council and SCHOOL BOARD.

    The actions of Avis Williams, the school principal behind this mess, are a direct reflection of any incumbent seeking re-election in any of those positions.

    There are also a number of state and national elections in 2010 as well…..

    I think any incumbent seeking re-election in the City of Huntsville or the State of Alabama should be judged at least in part, on how this situation resolves and their part in that resolution.

  6. I don’t blog or write, I’m just a Senior NCO who tries to do the right thing, be the example, and throw it all towards the job. I seved under MSG Grisham, saw his dealings with soldiers, company policy, and the like. Truly one of the best Senior NCOs I’ve had. As I’ve grown up in the Army, I’ve seen a lot of leadership styles, loved the fear of God approaches to the 1SG position as a necessary tool to ensure discipline. When I met MSG Grisham that cookie cutter mold broke. MSG’s style was a blend of friend and mentor, someone you could expect the truth from; whether you liked it or not.

    Understanding this is causing a disaster in his personal and professional life, I hope it will resolve with an answer to a simple question: Do Soldier’s have the right to free speech?

  7. I support CJ 100%. he helped uncover a scam being perpetrated on my daughter by an alleged American soldier in Iraq. I understand attempts by military leaders to stifle any kind of dissent. I was told by my Operations Officer on more than one occasion to stop writing letters that caused him problems. I lived under veiled threats that I might face punishment unless I stopped writing letters.
    I will do anything I can to help CJ in his battle with the Army. It’ reamains obvious that some sneior military commanders are more concerned about appearances than about their subordinates.
    We need some retired military senior officers to speak out and we need some way of providing a counterweight to IG’s who may be corrupted by the people they are supposed to oversee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.