Nick Meo was an embed journalist from the UK who was recently in the Khandahar area embedded with PMT and ETT mentors of TF Phoenix. I have been alerted to some terrible articles he wrote about that experience. Articles full of lies, slander and twisted truths. Articles that pump his own ego and try to make him seem more than he is, but at the same time show him as a coward by jumping on a medevac helicopter to leave the combat area rather than ride back, and he was not even wounded.

Please feel free to try emailing him at, or you can try emailing the newspaper at if the address for Nick does not work. Let them know what you think of his lies, twisting of the truth to make it feel worse and his utter dis-respect for the American soldiers that protected him. You can also make an international call to 0800 316 6977 and let them know how you feel.

I hope you read this entire blog, send the link to your friends and spread the word to other blogs, etc. Nick Meo and the editors of need to know this type of reporting is not appreciated, respected or wanted by citizens of this world.

Here are some of the lies and terrible things he has said, as noted by the ARSIC-South Public Affairs Officer (PAO):

  • Mentioned that our National Guardsmen, deployed with the 27th Brigade Combat Team, who have been deployed from their homes since January, are a ‘territorial army’ and a “part-time soldiers” shows how little you know about our soldiers deployed here in southern Afghanistan. National Guardsmen across the United States of America can be deployed for plethora missions- they range from federal active-duty for missions abroad and for state missions that may include snow storms, ice storms, hurricanes, floods, and much more.

  • Referred to a “dreadful Mohican-style army haircut” as you referred to Maj. James Becker, the PMT Team Chief, which I found wholly disgraceful and uncalled for. I don’t know what you think Maj. Becker did to you, to deserve a statement like that, but I was embarrassed for you for making such a statement- especially about a man and soldier who is professional and as hard-working as Maj. Becker. Maj. Becker helped save your life and you should be grateful you had such a soldier leading the convoy you were on and the soldiers in his Police Mentor Team.

  • Referred to Spec. Mitch Chapman as a New York Army National Guard soldier. Had you actually researched anything about Spec. Chapman, you would have easily learned Chapman is from the Illinois National Guard, but alas, you probably didn’t feel the need to properly research anything for your article, as is obvious from reading it.

  • Quoted Spec. Chapman as saying he had never driven a Cougar vehicle before. In fact, Spec. Chapman had just spent a week on Kandahar Airfield attending training to know how to properly drive the Cougar vehicle.

  • “I didn’t talk to him before we set off, which in a way I am now grateful for. Less than an hour later he was dead.” How low can one go, Nick? I was appalled to read the statement where you referred to Cpl. Scott Dimond, who was the gunner for your vehicle- providing security for his fellow soldiers, the convoy, and of course you, a reporter. Is this how you honor a fallen soldier of ours- by being thankful you never met him? Cpl. Dimond was out there risking his life for his fellow soldiers and you, and he was killed in action doing that job. Cpl. Dimond was an excellent soldier and you would have been lucky to have met him. Dimond was the standard in the United States Army- professional, met and exceeded standards, was proficient at his job, worked hard, and was always there for his fellow soldiers- a stellar soldier by far.

  • You wrote many inconsistencies in your story- ranging from accounts that our soldiers used flares and then later said they didn’t have flares or night-vision “cameras”. In one sentence you reported that our men fired flares at drivers who didn’t move. Then, later- half-way through the article, you mention our soldiers had no flares or night visions “cameras”. Then, later, you wrote that “a sergeant switched on a night-vision camera.” Which is it?

  • You Portrayed our soldiers with descriptives such as: panicky, fearful, and scared.  But, based on the video clips that you provided us, of the event, and a sworn statement you wrote- we have a clear picture that our soldiers, in your own words, “were conscious and talking.”  That doesn’t sound like screaming to me- which also wasn’t shown in the video you have of our men.  It seems to me you were trying paint a portrait of a situation that was not true; to dramatize a situation that wasn’t how you pretended to see it.

  • You provided more inconsistencies about small-arms fire “some distance” away and then you tried to pretend that our men were pouring out excessive fire.  For instance you wrote: “The British would have regarded this level of fire as excessive, and perhaps even trigger-happy.”  If the enemy is down-range, as you also described at one point in your article that they were, then using any type of firing at the enemy would guarantee the Taliban wouldn’t be able to come close to you and you’re alive today to vouch for that method.

  • You made plenty of overt and overzealous assumptions when you wrote about U.S. Soldiers firing their weapons into the night.  For example, the comment: “Could be Afghan homes out there” and “although God knows what it really was” when referring to a bunker the men fired upon.  Assumptions as far as a reporter is concerned are worthless in this situation; assumptions by trained soldiers, deployed to the most volatile region on the country -southern Afghanistan, are ingrained through training and working the battlefield day in and day out.

  • The “demanded my camera as evidence” comment is exactly what you expected when our Investigating Officer came to see you the very next morning after the incident…You might recall this as the moment when you first bold-faced lied about having any footage of the scene…. Then, when asked by the Investigating Officer you said no, you didn’t have any footage.  But, when pressed further, you caved in, admitting you did in fact videotape the scene after the attack.  Luckily, we were forewarned that you in fact did that, by our soldiers who stopped you on the scene.  You were videoing the death of a soldier and a comrade; no wonder the men were agitated with you.

  • “I wasn’t wounded,” you wrote… “ so I asked to go aboard the Black Hawk…”  You were so scared yourself and yet you can be so judgmental about U.S. soldiers.  You made our soldiers, doctors, and emergency care technicians waste their time on taking care of you when you admit you were fine.  Atrocious.

  • The statement where you claimed I (the PAO) said you were deceased is an absolute lie, but I know you wanted to use that type of lie so that your claim about you, a journalist, would receive accolades from your fellow journalists, editors, and other bosses, and be seen as an absolute journalistic hero is in fact wholly false…..The part about a post-it note is also just as false, but typical of the drama you were trying to create in your story.

  • In addition to all of this, Nick, you were provided a rare opportunity to attend the ramp ceremony honoring Cpl. Scott Dimond on his decent home.  When you were asked if you wanted to attend the ramp ceremony, your reply was that if you couldn’t cover the ceremony, by writing about it, then you didn’t want to attend at all.  It’s so disrespectful, despicable really.

  • In the third paragraph (of the second story) you wrote that four members of Easyrider’s PMT team were killed in a Cougar MRAP- False!  If you did the proper research that you should have done, you would have known that the it was members from a different PMT team that were killed in June in and they were in an MRAP, not the Cougar MRAP.  Obviously researching the facts for your story is just simply lost on you.

The link to the articles are:

UPDATE- My buds over at have also written a blog entry about this guy. Check it out at